<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ASA adjudication on Fathers4Justice ad marks Pyrrhic victory for Mumsnet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuartsmithsblog.com/2012/07/04/asa-adjudication-on-fathers4justice-ad-marks-pyrrhic-victory-for-mumsnet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuartsmithsblog.com/2012/07/04/asa-adjudication-on-fathers4justice-ad-marks-pyrrhic-victory-for-mumsnet/</link>
	<description>Read all about it – marketing and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 22:12:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuartsmithsblog</title>
		<link>http://stuartsmithsblog.com/2012/07/04/asa-adjudication-on-fathers4justice-ad-marks-pyrrhic-victory-for-mumsnet/#comment-5351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stuartsmithsblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 18:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsmithsblog.com/?p=8291#comment-5351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fair enough. What the ASA said about Mumsnet was: &quot;Mumsnet said that their forums regularly received over 25,000 posts per day and while it was not possible to monitor all of these posts, they relied on users of the forum to report any content that they considered to be offensive, which Mumsnet would then delete if it breached their terms of use. We contacted Mumsnet who reiterated that they did not tolerate any kind of prejudice on the site and this included any kind of gender bias but users did need to bring this to their attention if action was to be taken.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough. What the ASA said about Mumsnet was: &#8220;Mumsnet said that their forums regularly received over 25,000 posts per day and while it was not possible to monitor all of these posts, they relied on users of the forum to report any content that they considered to be offensive, which Mumsnet would then delete if it breached their terms of use. We contacted Mumsnet who reiterated that they did not tolerate any kind of prejudice on the site and this included any kind of gender bias but users did need to bring this to their attention if action was to be taken.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camilla Willson</title>
		<link>http://stuartsmithsblog.com/2012/07/04/asa-adjudication-on-fathers4justice-ad-marks-pyrrhic-victory-for-mumsnet/#comment-5347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Camilla Willson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsmithsblog.com/?p=8291#comment-5347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi there, this blog is factually wrong in its suggestion that Mumsnet &quot;seems to have become more vigilant in patrolling its content&quot;. Mumsnet&#039;s moderation policy remains as it ever was - ie we delete posts that are reported if they break our forum guidelines, which include no gender hatred.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, this blog is factually wrong in its suggestion that Mumsnet &#8220;seems to have become more vigilant in patrolling its content&#8221;. Mumsnet&#8217;s moderation policy remains as it ever was &#8211; ie we delete posts that are reported if they break our forum guidelines, which include no gender hatred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
