Synovate ponders controversial $1.5m Sudan deal

July 2, 2011

Synovate, the research arm of Aegis Group now being exclusively courted by Ipsos, should be careful who it does business with. Particularly at a time like this.

Word reaches me that it has recently been pitching for a lucrative $1.5m slice of pie in Northern Sudan. The client in question is DAL Group, a Khartoum North-based conglomerate which handles such august brands as Caterpillar, Mitsubishi Motors, KIA Motors, Mercedes-Benz, JVC, Glaxo, Unilever and, most interesting of all (see below), Coca-Cola (since 2002 DAL has been sole Sudanese bottler and distributor of the company’s brands).

DAL Group makes claim to “strong, clear business principles and ethical values”, and I have no reason to doubt it. The problem lies elsewhere. Since 1997, the US has placed a stringent trade embargo on Sudan, with penalties for infringement ranging up to $1m and 20 years imprisonment.

From what I understand, these sanctions can be circumvented by routing the business through the EU (where they are not in force). But leading the business from the US, which seems to be what is required here, would be tricky. The idea has certainly been enough to put the wind up WPP’s Kantar – believed to be the only other research company on the short-list – which withdrew from the pitch after it failed the corporate ethics test.

My advice to Synovate? It’s not worth it.

Mind you, when it comes to ethics, Synovate’s suitor Ipsos isn’t exactly above reproach itself. It recently came to my attention that the global research company is being investigated by the Brazilian authorities over suspected infringements of employment law and, in effect, tax evasion. Ipsos is quietly trying to settle some 82 claims against it, after the Labour Prosecutor Office began an investigation into the treatment of many local employees as long-term freelances, a by-product of which is the avoidance of taxes and social benefits attached to full-time status. There’s more on this here, for anyone whose Portuguese is up to speed.

About these ads

UK marketing managers should sip from the glass half-full

April 29, 2011

Curiouser and curiouser. Almost all the big battalions in marketing services have now reported their Quarter One financial results. Without exception they mirror the upbeat performance curve of Omnicom, the first out last week. Which is in bizarre contra-distinction to the gloomy outpouring of the Bellwether Report I commented on earlier.

No need for too much fact-grubbing here. Just look at the organic growth of the big agency groups. Publicis Groupe (6.5%), Havas (6.8%) and WPP (6.7%) easily coasted past Omnicom’s already impressive 5.2% global figure. Only Interpublic lagged – and even so achieved a creditable upturn of nearly 5%.

So what, you say? All this shows is a startling outperformance in emerging economies such as China, India and those of Latin America. Which is concealing lacklustre results in doldrums Europe – and particularly the UK.

Not exactly. True, the emerging markets are flattering overall performance. But when you look at the UK, you wouldn’t believe the economy is flat-lining at all. While no one else has achieved Omnicom’s astonishing UK organic growth rate of 9%, the general results are pretty impressive. At the bottom were Publicis, with 2.4%, and Havas (2.5%). Much more significant was WPP’s performance. WPP, now the world’s largest marketing services group, still derives 12% of its global revenue from the UK and managed to extract 7.7% organic growth. What’s more WPP chief Sir Martin Sorrell is cautiously optimistic about the prospects for 2011 and 2012. A more reliable index of Sorrell’s growing confidence is the fact that he has slipped the self-imposed £100m corset off WPP acquisitions; although he does caution the next one will “only” be about £200m. That is, the size of last year’s biggest – Mitchell Communications, which was acquired by Aegis Group.

So what’s with the Bellwether’s pessimism? UK marketing managers really should sip the glass half-full. There’s every reason to suppose it won’t poison them.


Aegis Group comes a cropper over £25m client bad debt

February 22, 2011

Aegis Group, the media buying, planning and research company, is beginning to look plain unlucky. Late last year, it had to eat humble pie after the much-trumpeted £200m deal with Mitchell Communications went sour. Aegis was forced to restate Mitchell revenue figures – downwards.

Now Aegis’ Spanish subsidiary has been landed with a bad debt of £25m, which will have to be written off against the 2010 profit and loss account. The cause of this debt is one of its former Spanish clients, Nueva Rumasa. It’s an industrial conglomerate – owned by the billionaire Ruiz Mateos family – which has been in financial trouble for some time. Which is why it has gone into the Spanish version of Chapter 11, a form of protected bankruptcy.

Note the “former”. Extraordinarily, Aegis appears to have extended Nueva Rumasa 24 months’ credit. Not, you might say, the usual terms.

Aegis will publish its annual figures on March 17 and says the bad debt will have no effect on its underlying performance. It will, however, likely affect the dividend. Earnings per share will have 20% lopped off them. City analysts had been forecasting EPS of 10p per share, pre-adjustment.

UPDATE 1/03/11: Financial expert Bob Willott asks how a public company like Aegis could have allowed a £25m debt to roll up, apparently unmonitored. How indeed? Lax Spanish practices seems to be the answer. Willott calls for heads (or a head at any rate) to roll. He’s probably right to do so. But I doubt they will. There’s more on the Rumasa bad debt in Willott’s Financial Intelligence newsletter...

… and in my Marketing Week column this week.


Which agency network group will land the next big deal?

December 31, 2010

Corporately, the 2010 agency scene has been remarkable in only one respect: the absence of a big, transformative deal. Consolidation, the key underlying trend of the past decade or so, seems to have stopped in its tracks.

True, there have been some near misses. Most notably, Dentsu nearly acquired digital network AKQA for about $600m, but backed off at the last minute over fears about the excessive price, not to mention the perceived hostility of AKQA’s senior management.

Publicis Groupe, however, did not launch its much-touted (not least by me) all-shares takeover bid for a holed-below-the-waterline Interpublic Group. And Vincent Bolloré, chairman of Havas, did not conclude the longest hostile takeover bid in history by acquiring the 70% of Aegis Group he does not already own.

Symbolic of this lacklustre M&A year has been the muted activity of the sector’s most aggressive actor, WPP. Group chief Sir Martin Sorrell restricted himself to useful infilling, of which the most decorative has been the acquisition this week of Blue State Digital, the agency that helped to propel Barack Obama into the White House, and the bankrolling of Peter Mandelson’s consulting business, Global Counsel. The £100m channelled into acquisitions this year is mere pocket money compared with WPP’s last big splurge – £1.1bn spent on buying research company TNS in late 2008.

Now I know New Year crystal-gazing is a dangerous thing – not least because the wildly inaccurate predictions, which often result, come back to haunt you. But I do believe change is in the air. No, really.

One straw in the wind is Omnicom’s return to the poker table after about a decade’s absence. Chief executive John Wren has pooh-poohed suggestions that his company will seek out transformative deals of the Razorfish (Publicis) and 24/7 Real Media (WPP) kind. But he has acknowledged Omnicom’s backwardness in the digital sphere and announced a Big Leap Forward. Typically, this is to take the form of partnerships rather than outright acquisition. All of which has not stopped Omnicom from getting into intensive negotiations to acquire eCRM company Communispace for about $100m (we may know the result of these quite soon; I gather there are some tax complications). Note that Omnicom has access to $2bn of revolving credit, with the option of an extra $500m.

Nor, for all the caveats that must surround any such bid, should we expunge Publicis/IPG from the script. Publicis has been put off its stride during 2010 by a messy succession crisis, which has now been settled for the time being. If anything, IPG’s plight has worsened during that time. To add to chief executive Michael Roth’s woes (prime among them, a smouldering fire in the IPG engine room, McCann Erickson), it looks very likely that one of his principal networks, DraftFCB, will lose its $1bn signature account, SC Johnson (which it has handled for decades).

Mitchell: Deal doesn’t add up?

And let’s remember that Aegis is not off the hook, either. Probably the most significant agency deal of 2010 was Aegis’ £200m acquisition of Mitchell Communications in July. Back then it seemed a shrewd move, and not only for Harold Mitchell, the eponymous founder, who ipso facto became a 4% holder of Aegis stock. In return, Aegis reckoned it had got significant exposure to Australasia, and a form of insurance against another hostile sortie from Bolloré – even if it did pay top Australian dollar for the privilege.

I have since heard the deal wasn’t quite as margin-enhancing as Aegis chief Jerry Buhlmann would have had us believe at the time. Mitchell has now admitted that revenues are not all they were cracked up to be. At any rate, Aegis has had to reissue its circular, with certain embarrassing amendments to corporate expectations contained therein. How Bolloré must be laughing all the way to his bank (Mediobanca).


Is Bolloré limbering up for a new tilt at Aegis?

September 28, 2010

Wouldn’t it be a shock if Vincent Bolloré, corporate raider, chairman of Havas and long-time would-be nemesis of Aegis, were finally to deliver his knock-out blow just when the media buying, digital and research group was least expecting it?

But he’d never do that would he, not now? Most informed commentators believe he missed his golden opportunity 18 months ago when Aegis had lost a third of its market value and was lurching rudderless after the incoming chairman, John Napier, fired group chief executive Robert Lerwill. Things are very different now, with Jerry Buhlman installed as ceo and actively engaged in an aggressive acquisitions policy that has successfully targeted Australian media buyer Mitchell Communications. The share price – an anaemic 75p 18 months ago – has now regained a lot of its former lustre, hovering around 123p.

So Bolloré, who owns 29.9% of Aegis, yet has failed five times to get two of his own directors on the board, would be mad to strike now – wouldn’t he? That’s certainly the impression he’s been cultivating with carefully placed interviews in France’s leading daily Le Figaro and the Financial Times. In the latter, the chairman and 33% owner of Havas tells us that the global advertising and media buying network is now poised to make a series of acquisitions but, he cautions: “It doesn’t mean we want to make one big shot but some different acquisitions in different countries.”

Really? What commentators seem to forget is that Havas itself was in no fit state to exploit Aegis’ weakness 18 months ago. It’s far better primed now, with up to €2bn (£1.7bn) in cash and loans available to it, and a much fitter share price to boot. Bolloré has close connections with Italy’s biggest publicly traded investment bank Mediobanca, of which he is a 5% shareholder.

Aegis is capitalised at about £1.47bn. A bid mixing Havas shares with substantial cash to sweeten Aegis’ extraordinarily loyal shareholders would be the way ahead.

Let’s see whether  – in the coming months – Bolloré has the courage to take it.


Harold Mitchell hedges his bets in shrewd £200m Aegis deal

July 29, 2010

Aegis Group’s bullish chief executive, Jerry Buhlmann, has been as good as his word. Back in March, on the coat-tails of some rather disappointing annual results, Aegis announced it was raising £175m through a convertible bond issue to “…bolt on acquisition capability.”

Now we know what he has bolted on: Mitchell Communications, Australia’s largest independent media-buying group. Actually it’s a bit more than that. Harold Mitchell, who set up the company in 1976 and still owns 30% of it, has been careful to diversify into other marketing services areas –public relations, branded entertainment, sponsorship and digital marketing among them.

There seems no reason to doubt Aegis’ boast that the acquisition is a good cultural and geographical fit, which will immensely leverage its position in Australasia. Whether the £208m deal, 60:40 in cash and shares, is as “earnings accretive” as the company makes out is another matter. At 18x earnings, it looks a wee bit pricey.

Then again, quality costs. And there may be hidden strategic wisdom in this apparent money madness. The deal will, in the short term, make it even more difficult for 29.9% shareholder Vincent Bolloré to bring to fruition what must by now be the longest-running takeover bid in corporate history. Despite Aegis’ historically low share price in recent times, Bolloré has not had the wherewithal for a coup de grace. Indeed, he seems to have been casting about for allies to help him in a break-up bid. If so, the revving tank engines will now be switched off while he considers his next move.

One important insight here is Harold Mitchell’s decision to take up all his rights in shares not plump for the cash – which has the effect of making him a 4% holder of Aegis stock. You might argue that he had little choice if he were not to appear disloyal to his new owner. Even so, a smaller amount taken out in cash would not have been unreasonable. So why has he done it? One possibility is that the wily old bird scents the inevitability of takeover. Not now, perhaps, but in the medium term. A bid premium would have to be at least 30% above the recently traded share price: better than any return made on cash taken out. He’s shrewdly hedging his bets.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 416 other followers

%d bloggers like this: